Character History
The play of Anton Pavlovich Chekhov "Cherry Garden" is considered an example of dramaturgical classics. Its creation accompanied the turning point in the Russian Theater and Russian literature. This is a lyrical comedy with a sad post-charming work.History of creation
Literary critics believe that the play is autobiographical. The plot of works is built around the disassembled nobility family, forced to sell the generic estate. Chekhov has happened to get into such a situation, so he knew the experiences of his heroes. The mental state of each character was familiar to the writer as a person who came across the need to leave the native home. The narration is permeated with a subtle psychologist.
An innovation of the play was that her actors were divided not on positive and negative heroes, not on the main and secondary. These were the people of the past, present and the future, whom the writer classified in accordance with their worldview. Lopakhin was a representative of the present, although sometimes there is a feeling that he could claim the position of a person of the future.
Work on the work was carried out from 1901 to 1903. Chekhov was seriously ill, but completed the play, and in 1904 the premiere of theatrical statement on the new plot was held on the stage of the Moscow Art Theater.
"The Cherry Orchard"
Biography and fate of Yermolia Alekseevich Vopakhina closely connected with the life of the Ranevskaya family. The father of the hero was a serfdom of Ranevskaya's father and industrially traded. The young young lady showed sympathy to the Yunsha, who flew out of his father, and he tells about it, recalling the history of life in serfdom. Ranevskoy's attitude excited about the consciousness of the Yermola's blades. He liked the caress of an attractive girl, but he understood that there was a precipice based on slavery. Even the meaning of the surname and the name of the hero says that it is intended for a completely different society.
Lopahin rich, becoming a merchant, and was able to turn his destiny. He made himself himself and in the absence of proper education, he was gone into people than it is not proud of. Although it is recognized that the books for him are empty, and the handwriting never found a noble view. The former fortress everything has achieved a diligent work, his whole life consists of work. Lopakhin is in a hurry all the time, looking at the clock, waiting for a new meeting. He can be managed with his own time and finance, unlike the Ranevskaya family.
Lopakhin more than once turns a conversation about the cherry garden, offering help. It is easy to break up with money, giving a debt, but in the case of the estate-selling estate, the other is mixed up: Lopahin loves Ranevskaya. He comes to noble, offering to buy a garden and pass it under the country areas, although he could buy it for its own use.
Lopahin demonstrates amazing for former serfdom business qualities. It is practical and calculated, but does not use his talents against loved ones. At the same time, some characters give an impartial characteristic of the hero, believing that the lopahin pursues the possibility of a profitable transaction.
Throughout the action, it repeatedly comes to the marriage of the blades on Vare. Yermolai does not marry a girl not because of the lack of amented, but because of the question of cutting the garden. Varya sees only the Deltsy in the groom, to which the wedding can be beneficial as a deal. The incoherent dialogues between the heroes make it clear that there is no mutual understanding between them. Love for Ranevskaya, warm in the heart of the blades, does not allow him to think about other women. The hero makes the Ware proposal solely at the request of his beloved.
In the play every hero, something loses with the "cherry garden". Lopakhin loses faith in love, realizing that the image of a simple man was constantly established behind him in the perception of Ranevskaya. Having bought Ranenevskaya, a representative of the future, the owner of the estate, where his family was in the service, flows into Euphoria. But, acquiring a garden, he did not achieve the fulfillment of the dream, which remained unattainable. Ranevskaya leaves Russia, leaving in Paris, and Lopahin remains alone with the estate where his youth passed.
In the final of the play Ermolai Alekseevich speaks of awkward life. For him, the fact that everything he sought was becoming empty. He realizes how many people in his country exist aimlessly and do not understand why they live.
The author's attitude towards the blades is not so negative as the other characters play. Chekhov believes the blades "untaping" and justifies the hero of the lack of education and education. Many acts of the blades indicate that, despite the business grip, a man does not have a simple prudency. He is late for the train to meet Ranevskaya. Wanting to help her out of trouble, buys the garden. Decides to call the boil and immediately forget about it.
The image of the blades is incredibly relevant in recent decades. This is a "hero of our time," skillfully building a business, but a stale soul. A person who is incapable of perception and thinking exclusively about its own self-realization through material goods. Ermolai Lopakhin presents its description Czech AntiPorts. A subtly feeling writer whose works are full of philosophical meaning and tragidity, is the exact opposite of the Son of serfs who knocked into people.
Shielding
The first film screening of the Russian playwright Chekhov was made in Japan in 1936 by director Mooraot Makoto. Heroes were upgraded under current Japanese images. In 1959, Deniel Petri's director removed the film "Cherry Garden", in which the role of the Lopakhina fulfilled Martin Hithe. In the formulation of Yana Bully, 1973, the image of a vestovent was absent, and in the Soviet filmmaking of 1976, Yuri Cayurov appeared in the role of a merchant in TV except for Leonid Haifez.
Richard Eid in 1981 he filmed in the role of Lopakhina Bill Paterson, and in the Soviet picture of Igor Ilyinsky 1983, Viktor Korshun played Yermolaya. Anna Chernakova, who removed the film "Cherry Garden" after 10 years, invited to the role of Lopakhina Alexander Feklisov. The image of the merchant in the television film Sergey Ovcharova in 2008 went to Roman Ageev. Vladimir Vysotsky became the most famous performer of this role on theatrical scene.
Quotes
Lopakhina paints the fact that he does not forget his place. Like any person who has not seen a prosperous life, he is proud of what he managed to achieve without protection and help. For him, the main expression of success are material benefits:
"My father, though, was a man, and here in a white vest, yellow shoes."
The hero understands how valuable in its current situation would be the education he did not receive. He also feels that he lacks the ability to understand the world, in which he seeks to get, where he wants to be accepted for "his":
"My dad was a man, an idiot, I did not understand anything, I did not taught me, but only beat Spyan, and all the stick. In essence, and I am the same boy and idiot. Nothing studied, the handwriting is bad, I write so that from people conscientious like a pig. "The main achievement of the Lopakhina is that he manages to understand: the life to which he seeks - Niccene. Money does not bring him pleasure. Having a cherry garden gives an understanding that his dreams turned out to be empty, pleasure from their performance is doubtful. The work becomes for the hero the main life credo:
"When I work for a long time, without tired, then thoughts easier, and it seems that I also know what I exist. And how much, brother, in Russia, people who exist is unknown for what. "